Fast signal
$79
Entry Kit
For leaders who want a quick evidence signal before involving more people.
Short PDF guide
Workbook
CSV import templates
First-pass score view
Back to Decision Kits
AI readiness / Core decision kit
AI Production Readiness Decision Kits
Move one AI workflow from demo energy to a production decision leaders can defend. Use the kit to prove whether the workflow has the evidence, controls, ownership, recovery path, and ROI logic to move forward with confidence.
AI readiness packages
Choose The Level Of Evidence The AI Decision Deserves.
Built for retail and ecommerce leaders who need to know whether one AI workflow is ready for a controlled production path. The kit turns momentum into evidence around data, controls, human review, ownership, downstream impact, and ROI.
Entry, Core, And Advisory
Secured Checkout
Bonuses Included
Workflow
Prove the workflow.
Bring source data, owners, handoffs, exceptions, and review rules into one place before AI scope expands.
Controls
Design the stop points.
Make human review, fallback, recovery, and escalation visible before production pressure arrives.
ROI
Give leaders the business case.
Connect the AI decision to effort, risk exposure, service impact, confidence, and payback logic.
Complete decision path
$200
Core Decision Kit
For leaders who need the full PDF, workbook, CSV import files, ROI lens, and leadership-ready next steps.
Detailed PDF guide
Workbook
CSV import templates
ROI worksheet
Readout outline
90-day path
Senior interpretation
$1,500
Advisory Review
For leadership teams that want completed evidence interpreted through a senior advisory lens.
Core kit included
Advisory PDF
Workbook examples
Evidence templates
Readout deck assets
Investment tier comparison
Match The Kit To The AI Decision In Front Of You.
Entry gives a fast read on one workflow. Core gives the complete evidence workspace. Advisory Review adds a senior read once your team has completed the evidence.
| Capability | Entry | Core | Advisory |
|---|---|---|---|
| PDF guide | Short PDF guide | Detailed decision PDF | Advisory review PDF |
| Workbook | Working workbook | Detailed workbook | Working and completed examples |
| CSV files | Import templates | Import templates | Templates and completed examples |
| Evidence map | Signal prompts | Full template set | Evidence interpretation |
| ROI logic | Starter lens | Full worksheet | Reviewed narrative |
| 90-day path | Starter path | Complete action path | Reviewed next steps |
| Leadership questions | Included | Expanded | Senior-level question bank |
| Bonuses | Prompt bank | Readout outline | Advisory note pack |
| Senior advisory lens | Not included | Not included | Included |
| Execution planning | Not included | Optional add-on | Optional add-on |
Proof and ROI
Know Whether One AI Workflow Deserves The Next Investment.
The kit helps leadership decide whether to stop, narrow, stabilize, pilot, or scale with the evidence in view.
Replaces AI enthusiasm with workflow evidence leaders can review.
Makes human review, fallback, and exception handling visible before launch.
Connects the AI decision to risk exposure, ownership, operating effort, and ROI.
Production Readiness Profile
Workflow evidence
82%
Controls and recovery
74%
Business case clarity
68%
90-day path
90%
Illustrative readiness view. The actual result depends on the evidence your team completes.
Field proof
What changes when AI gets judged like an operating decision.
It moved the conversation from interest to the evidence leadership needed to make the call.
The scorecard made the risk, ROI, and ownership conversation concrete enough to decide what deserved the next investment.
The 90-day path helped us separate useful automation from work that needed better data and ownership first.
Next step
Make The Next AI Decision Easier To Approve.
Choose the tier that matches the evidence you need, then get the kit assets through secured checkout.
Start with one workflow and turn interest into a leadership-ready call.
Get The Core Kit
Secured checkout. Immediate access to the selected kit assets.
Outcome
The complete decision workspace for turning debate into evidence, tradeoffs, and a 90-day path leadership can review.
A strong AI answer can win attention. Production requires more: trusted inputs, visible controls, accountable owners, support paths, and a value case the business can explain when the workflow moves beyond a demo.
Designed for deeper evidence capture, score interpretation, ROI framing, owner agreement, and leadership alignment.
Evidence capture
An AI workflow has executive attention, but source data, fallback rules, human review, and ownership still need to be proven.
Scorecard workbook
The pilot created momentum, yet no one can explain what happens when inputs are stale, wrong, incomplete, or outside policy.
Decision path
Leadership needs a clear pause, narrow, stabilize, pilot, or scale decision before more roadmap capacity is committed.
Decision package
The PDF guide, workbook, CSV import files, and decision path help move one AI workflow from interest to a production decision leaders can defend.
PDF, workbook, and workspace assets built for one leadership-ready decision.
Deliverables
Everything You Need To Make The AI Decision.
Turn one workflow into a clean decision package: evidence, ownership, controls, ROI logic, and the next 90 days in one place.
Get The Core KitSecured checkout. Immediate access to the selected kit assets.
Executive Readiness Brief
A concise leadership brief that states the workflow, decision owner, evidence level, and recommended next move.
Workflow Evidence Map
A one-page view of the inputs, handoffs, source systems, owners, and exceptions behind the AI workflow.
Control and Fallback Checklist
Operating checks that show when to review, stop, correct, or route the workflow to a human owner.
ROI and Effort Worksheet
A practical worksheet for baseline effort, value levers, operating investment, confidence, and payback logic.
90-Day Decision Path
A sequenced path for selecting the workflow, tightening controls, and preparing the leadership readout.
Vendor Claim Questions
Questions that test vendor claims against your data, support model, workflow limits, and ownership requirements.
Bonuses: Leadership Readout Outline
A ready-to-use outline for turning the evidence into a clear executive conversation.
Bonuses: Production-Risk Prompt Bank
Prompts that pressure-test data quality, exceptions, recovery paths, and production ownership before scale.
Evidence Map
Every Input Becomes A Decision Asset.
Instead of scattered opinions, the intake turns the workflow into a clear operating picture leaders can inspect.
Decision At Stake
The exact AI decision leadership needs to make and the business outcome it affects.
Workflow Reality
The real trigger, handoffs, exceptions, and human decisions around the workflow.
Source Evidence
The inputs, owners, refresh cadence, quality checks, and missing data that shape output quality.
Control Model
The review rules, thresholds, fallback path, logs, and stop conditions needed before scale.
Business Case
The cycle time, manual effort, service impact, risk exposure, and ROI logic behind the recommendation.
Owner Agreement
The business, data, technology, support, and vendor owners who keep the workflow accountable.
Scorecard
See What Is Ready, Weak, And Worth Tightening.
A polished answer is not a production decision. The scorecard separates evidence, controls, ownership, and ROI so leadership can see exactly where confidence is strong enough to move.
Readiness
Score 7 Lenses
Score 7 Lenses
Strong Evidence
Inputs, owners, controls, and ROI are defensible.
Decision Gaps
Weak signals show where to narrow, pause, or stabilize.
-
Business Fit
The workflow protects a named customer, margin, service, risk, or capacity outcome.
-
Workflow Evidence
The team can trace how work happens now before asking AI to act inside it.
-
Data Readiness
Inputs have source owners, quality checks, refresh rules, and recovery paths.
-
Control Design
The team can inspect, stop, correct, and explain the workflow when output quality changes.
-
Operating Ownership
Each recurring decision has an accountable owner and review cadence.
-
ROI Logic
The value case links baseline effort, operating effort, confidence, and payback.
-
Vendor Fit
External claims are tested against the actual workflow boundary, support model, and exit path.
Scenario Tests
Four Checks Before The Decision Expands.
The kit pressure-tests the workflow against the moments that usually create rework, risk, and leadership hesitation.
The output looks polished but uses stale or incomplete data.
Use the kit to expose source ownership, freshness rules, and review thresholds before scope expands.
The workflow handles the happy path but breaks when exceptions appear.
Use the kit to define fallback rules, manual review, and escalation paths.
The AI action creates downstream rework in OMS, ERP, CRM, POS, PIM, WMS, or support.
Use the kit to map platform impact before scope expands.
Leaders see activity but cannot explain business value.
Use the kit to connect the workflow to baseline effort, risk exposure, owner agreement, and ROI.
30 / 60 / 90 Path
Here Is What Changes Across 90 Days.
Select the workflow
Choose one AI workflow, name the decision, capture current evidence, and map owners.
Design the controls
Pressure-test data, exceptions, human review, platform impact, and ROI assumptions.
Make the call
Choose pause, narrow, stabilize, pilot, or scale, then prepare the leadership readout.
Advisor Questions
The Questions Leadership Stops Circling.
Use the kit to turn the discussion into accountable answers before tools, people, or roadmap capacity move.
-
Which single workflow is worth testing first because it carries customer, margin, risk, or delivery impact?
-
What evidence would move leadership from interest to a controlled production decision?
-
Where does the workflow stop if output confidence is low or outside approved boundaries?
-
Which downstream platform feels the impact first if the AI action is wrong?
-
Who owns the production behavior after the demo team moves on and support questions begin?
FAQ
Common decision questions.
Which tier should I choose?
Choose Entry when you only need a fast read. Choose Core when the decision is active and leadership needs the full evidence system. Choose Advisory Review when completed evidence needs senior interpretation before the next commitment.
Do I need a call first?
No. Entry and Core are designed for direct purchase and immediate use. Advisory Review is also purchased directly, then the intake package guides what evidence to submit for review.
Is this implementation or delivery work?
No. The kit helps leadership make a clearer decision before implementation investment, vendor selection, roadmap commitment, or a larger advisory engagement.
What happens after checkout?
Secured checkout processes the investment and provides access to the selected kit assets. Checkout buttons go directly to secured checkout, not to another internal JM Digital page.
Is the scope limited?
Yes. Each kit is intentionally limited to one decision path so leaders can create evidence, alignment, and movement without turning the work into a broad transformation program.
What should I have ready before starting?
Start with the decision you need to make, the systems involved, the current evidence you already have, and the owner who will need to explain the recommendation.
What is the advisory agreement for the review?
For the Advisory Review, the purchase establishes the working agreement for the review intake, evidence submission, and senior interpretation notes.