Entry Kit
For teams doing early platform exploration before the decision gets larger.
Short PDF guide
Working workbook
CSV import templates
Risk flags
Replatforming / Entry kit
Make the platform decision before vendor momentum becomes the plan. Use the kit to assess platform fit, migration risk, operating readiness, data dependencies, ownership, launch control, and value before the roadmap hardens.
Replatforming packages
Built for teams comparing platforms, preparing migration, or trying to recover a path that has become too broad. The kit clarifies what to keep, retire, redesign, prove, govern, and control before the roadmap hardens.
Look at capability, catalog, release cadence, ownership, and customer journey fit before preference takes over.
Map data, integrations, apps, redirects, reporting, workflows, QA, and ownership before the roadmap locks.
Name launch gates, support paths, rollback paths, and acceptance criteria before the platform decision is approved.
For teams doing early platform exploration before the decision gets larger.
Short PDF guide
Working workbook
CSV import templates
Risk flags
For teams comparing platform options or preparing an internal recommendation.
Detailed PDF guide
Workbook
CSV import templates
Tradeoff matrix
Vendor questions
90-day path
For leadership teams preparing a major platform decision.
Core kit included
Advisory PDF
Workbook examples
Evidence templates
Readout deck assets
Investment tier comparison
Entry gives a fast platform signal. Core gives the complete replatforming decision workspace. Advisory Review adds senior interpretation before a major recommendation moves forward.
| Capability | Entry | Core | Advisory |
|---|---|---|---|
| PDF guide | Short PDF guide | Detailed decision PDF | Advisory review PDF |
| Workbook | Working workbook | Detailed workbook | Working and completed examples |
| CSV files | Import templates | Import templates | Templates and completed examples |
| Evidence map | Signal prompts | Full template set | Evidence interpretation |
| ROI logic | Starter lens | Full worksheet | Reviewed narrative |
| 90-day path | Starter path | Complete action path | Reviewed next steps |
| Leadership questions | Included | Expanded | Senior-level question bank |
| Bonuses | Prompt bank | Readout outline | Advisory note pack |
| Senior advisory lens | Not included | Not included | Included |
| Execution planning | Not included | Optional add-on | Optional add-on |
Proof and ROI
The kit keeps fit, migration risk, data readiness, launch control, ownership, and value in one executive view.
Separates platform capability from upstream data, process, ownership, and partner constraints.
Forces migration risk to be discussed before scope hardens.
Helps leadership compare options before the vendor story sets the agenda.
Illustrative platform view. Your result depends on the migration evidence your team completes.
Field proof
It kept the platform conversation honest. We could see what belonged in Shopify, what stayed upstream, and what needed ownership first.
The launch controls and migration review made the plan more defensible.
The scorecard helped us stop debating preferences and start comparing evidence.
Next step
Choose the tier that fits your decision stage, then use the kit to pressure-test platform fit and launch readiness.
Start before selection, migration scope, or vendor assumptions become harder to unwind.
Checkout opens August 6, 2026. Kit assets are scheduled for release next Thursday.
Outcome
A platform move can create speed and control, but it can also move the same complexity into a new stack. The right decision needs a grounded view of what to keep, retire, simplify, rebuild, govern, or delay.
Designed for a concise PDF guide, workbook score, and CSV import files so you can see whether the decision deserves deeper work.
Best Fit
A new platform is being discussed before the operating model, data dependencies, and launch controls are clean.
Stakeholders are comparing platforms by preference instead of evidence, capability fit, migration surface, and launch risk.
Leadership needs a practical decision package before scope, vendor assumptions, or roadmap commitments harden.
Deliverables
Each asset is built to move the conversation from platform preference to fit, migration surface, launch control, ownership, and value.
Checkout opens August 6, 2026. Kit assets are scheduled for release next Thursday.
A leadership brief that defines the platform decision, capability objective, decision gate, and evidence needed before the roadmap hardens.
A practical map of product, order, customer, content, app, workflow, reporting, and integration dependencies.
A structured comparison of platform fit against operating model, catalog complexity, release cadence, and internal ownership.
A scorecard for platform fit, migration evidence, data readiness, launch controls, owner clarity, ROI logic, and scope discipline.
A worksheet for platform value, implementation effort, operating lift, rework avoided, and confidence level.
A path for framing the decision, testing assumptions, and preparing an executive readout before selection or migration scope expands.
Questions that test vendor claims against your real dependencies, support model, launch gates, and exit path.
A launch-readiness checklist for QA, redirects, payments, tax, fraud, support, rollback, and incident ownership.
Migration Evidence
The intake captures the current-state friction, migration surface, launch agreement, value case, and decision gate behind the platform move.
The platform decision leadership needs to make and the business capability it should unlock.
The release delays, manual work, operating gaps, support load, or customer friction driving the move.
The data, integrations, templates, apps, workflows, redirects, and reporting touched by the move.
The owners, acceptance gates, rollback path, and support model required before launch.
The measurable reason to move: speed, control, resilience, service quality, conversion, or operating leverage.
The moment leadership chooses move, defer, narrow, recover, or redesign the platform path.
Platform Scorecard
The scorecard keeps platform capability, migration evidence, data readiness, launch gates, ownership, ROI, and scope discipline in the same executive conversation.
The platform supports the operating model, catalog, customer journey, and change cadence.
Known dependencies are documented before roadmap and vendor assumptions harden.
Product, customer, order, inventory, and reporting flows have source ownership and acceptance rules.
QA, rollback, redirects, support, release, and incident paths are ready before launch.
Business, technology, data, vendor, and support owners are clear.
The platform move connects to speed, lower rework, cleaner operations, or better customer experience.
The plan is limited enough to deliver value without turning into a sprawling transformation.
Scenario Tests
Use these checks when vendor momentum, late dependencies, and thin launch controls could make a platform decision harder to defend.
Use the kit to define what must be true before selection.
Use the kit to map data, integrations, owners, and launch gates.
Use the kit to separate platform work from ownership, workflow, and data work.
Use the kit to identify acceptance gates before scope expands.
30 / 60 / 90 Path
Name the capability, migration surface, constraints, and owner model.
Compare options against evidence, dependencies, launch controls, and ROI logic.
Create the executive readout, action path, and agreement on what moves next.
Advisor Questions
The kit helps leadership compare evidence, assumptions, dependencies, and launch readiness before the external story narrows the choice.
What business capability should the platform move unlock first?
Which dependency will create the most risk if it is discovered late?
What should be simplified before migration, not after?
Which assumptions need evidence before vendor selection?
What launch agreement is required across business, technology, support, data, and vendor teams?
FAQ
Choose Entry when you only need a fast read. Choose Core when the decision is active and leadership needs the full evidence system. Choose Advisory Review when completed evidence needs senior interpretation before the next commitment.
No call is required to review the offer. Checkout opens August 6, 2026; once access opens, the selected tier will guide the next evidence step.
No. The kit helps leadership make a clearer decision before implementation investment, vendor selection, roadmap commitment, or a larger advisory engagement.
Checkout opens August 6, 2026. Until then, this page is available for review and the kit assets remain scheduled for release.
Yes. Each kit is intentionally limited to one decision path so leaders can create evidence, alignment, and movement without turning the work into a broad transformation program.
Start with the decision you need to make, the systems involved, the current evidence you already have, and the owner who will need to explain the recommendation.
For the Advisory Review, the purchase establishes the working agreement for the review intake, evidence submission, and senior interpretation notes.